Warner Bros Home Entertainment Inc v. Valerie Herrera et al
| Warner Bros Home Entertainment Inc |
| Valerie Herrera and Does |
| 2:2013cv04059 |
| June 6, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| John A. Kronstadt |
| Copyright |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
CONSENT JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION by Judge John A. Kronstadt in favor of Warner Bros Home Entertainment Inc against Valerie Herrera. Plaintiff owns or controls the copyright or pertinent exclusive right to distribute or license the distribu tion of home video and digital products, including video homecassettes (VHS) as well as optical discs, including, but not limited to, digital versatile discs (DVDs) and Blu-ray discs (collectively Media Products) incorporating the motion picture or t elevision titles subject to the copyright registrations listed in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (collectively referred to herein as Plaintiffs Works). Defendants and their agents, servants, employees, representat ives, successor and assigns, and all persons, firms, corporations or other entities in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of the Injunction are hereby restrained and permanently enjoined from infringing directly, con tributorily or vicariously or enabling, facilitating, permitting, assisting, soliciting, encouraging, inducing, authorizing, aiding or abetting, materially contributing to, or persuading anyone to infringe in any manner Plaintiffs Works, including, but not limited to, the following: Copying, reproducing, downloading, distributing, uploading, linking to,transmitting, or publicly performing, or using trademarks, trade names orlogos in connection with unauthorized Media Products containing any of Plaintiffs Work. Enabling, facilitating, permitting, assisting, soliciting, encouraging, abetting, or inducing any person or entity to copy, reproduce, download, distribute, upload, link to, transmit, or publicly perform any of Plaintiffs Works with out authorization; or Profiting from the unauthorized copying, reproduction, downloading, distribution, uploading, linking to, transmission, or public performance of any of Plaintiffs Works while declining to exercise a right to stop or limit such un authorized copying, reproduction, downloading, distribution, uploading, linking to, transmission, or public performance of any of Plaintiffs Works. Each side shall bear its own fees and costs of suit. Except as provided herein, all claims alleged in the Complaint are dismissed with prejudice. (See order for further details) (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (shb)
|
|
Filing
29
AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian re Amended Stipulation for Protective Order 28 . Based upon the representations of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court approves the Parties' Amended Stipulation for Protective Order filed on November 12, 2013, the terms of which shall be enforceable by this Court in all respects. (hr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
