Romye Robinson et al v. Delicious Vinyl Records Inc et al
| Romye Robinson and Imani Wilcox |
| Derrick Stewart, Trevant Hardson, Does, Delicious Vinyl, Inc. and Delicious Vinyl Records LLC |
| 2:2013cv04111 |
| June 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court DENIES Defendant Delicious Vinyl, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment 114 in its entirety. Court Reporter: Katherine Stride. (gk)
|
|
Filing
91
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application for Order to Show Cause Why Defendants Should Not Be Held in Contempt 84 is hereby DENIED. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
|
Filing
63
AMENDED PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 50 by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court ORDERS: DELICIOUS VINYL, INC., TREVANT HARDSON, and DERRICK STEWART ARE HEREBY RESTRAINED AND ENJOINED from using the PHARCYDE common law trademark and service mark of Plaint iffs (the "Pharcyde Marks"), etc. Prior to and including 11/23/2013, DV may use the Pharcyde marks and its own copyrighted artwork featured in Bizarre Ride II the Pharcyde (the "Album Art") in connection with the live performance of music by HARDSON and STEWART to promote the 20th anniversary release of the album Bizarre Ride II the Pharcyde. After 11/23/2013, DV shall not use the Pharcyde Marks or the Album Art in connection with the live performance of music, and/or the pro motion or advertisement thereof. HARDSON and STEWART may publicly assert that they are former members of the Pharcyde, and to that extent, they may use the name Pharcyde in making that assertion, provided that such disclosure is clearly stated, as a description of HARDSON and STEWART's former affiliation with the Pharcyde. The Preliminary Injunction is effective on Plaintiffs' filing an undertaking in the sum of $50,000.00. See document for details. (gk)
|
|
Filing
50
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court ORDERS that DELICIOUS VINYL, INC., TREVANT HARDSON, and DERRICK STEWART ARE HEREBY RESTRAINED AND ENJOINED from using the PHARCYDE common law trademark and service mark of Plaintiffs herein, or any derivative, or materially confusingly similar words or phrases thereof, etc. The Preliminary Injunction is effective on Plaintiffs' filing an undertaking in the sum of $50,000.00. See document for details. (gk)
|
|
Filing
16
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court denies Plaintiffs' Ex Parte Application for a Temporary Restraining Order 7 . Although the Court finds that a temporary restraining order should not issue at present, the Court ORDER S defendants to show cause as to why a preliminary injunction should not issue. Plaintiffs' are ordered to serve a copy of this minute order on defendants forthwith. The Court sets the following hearing and briefing schedule for plaintiffs' request for a preliminary injunction: Defendants must file an opposition to plaintiffs' request for a preliminary injunction by 5/24/2013. Plaintiffs may file a reply to defendants' opposition, if any, by 7/1/2013. A hearing regarding plaintiffs' request for a preliminary injunction will take place on 7/8/2013 at 10:00 AM. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
