Matrix Inc v. Love Tree Fashion Inc et al
| Matrix Inc |
| Love Tree Fashion Inc, Iron Puppy, Does, Cornerstone Apparel Inc, A'Gaci LLC and The TJX Companies Inc |
| 2:2013cv04565 |
| June 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jay C. Gandhi |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Copyright |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing no later than Tuesday, January 21, 2014,why they have no finalized their settlement. No hearing will be held on this matter. The Court also VACATES all over dates pending in this case. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a voluntary or stipulated dismissal. (lc). Modified on 1/13/2014. (lc). Modified on 1/13/2014 (lc).
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR RELIEF PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 60 39 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court also SETS a scheduling conference for Monday, October 28, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. The parties shall submit their joint 26(f) report no later than Monday, October 21, 2013. The Court will reissue the Order docked at entry 24 with the updated scheduling-conference date. (lc). Modified on 10/10/2013 .(lc).
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS 25 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 9/4/2013 (lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
