Leo Gabrielian v. Lafayette Life Insurance Company et al
Leo Gabrielian |
Does and Lafayette Life Insurance Company |
2:2013cv04694 |
June 27, 2013 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F. Eick |
Beverly Reid O'Connell |
Insurance |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 137 ORDER FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, in favor of Lafayette Life Insurance Company against Leo Gabrielian: This Court has read and considered the Joint Stipulation for Entry of Final Judgment of Plaintiff Leo Gabrielian a nd Defendant The Lafayette Life Insurance Company. PURSUANT TO SUCH STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Judgment shall be entered forthwith in favor of Defendant The Lafayette Life Insurance Company on all claims and issues in this matter and against Plaintiff Leo Gabrielian, including, but not limited to, claims for relief and remedies available under: (1) Declaratory Relief; (2) Breach of Contract; (3) Breach of the Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing; and (4) Bad Faith. Related to: Stipulation 135 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm) |
Filing 29 JUDGMENT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED: (1) Plaintiff shall take nothing on his Complaint and the action shall be dismissed on the merits; and (2) Defendant may apply to recover from Plaintiff its reasonable costs of suit. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.