Luke Zeman v. XTRA Lease LLC et al
| Luke Zeman |
| Does and EXTRA Lease LLC |
| 2:2013cv04990 |
| July 11, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F. Eick |
| Dean D. Pregerson |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
123
JUDGMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Pursuant to the F.R. Civ. P. 68 Offer of Judgment made by DEFENDANT XTRA LEASE LLC on April 22, 2016, which was accepted by PLAINTIFF LUKE ZEMAN on April 28, 2016 120 , it is hereby ADJUDGED and ORDERED that jud gment is hereby entered in favor of LUKE ZEMAN and against XTRA LEASE LLC on the following terms: Payable to Plaintiff Zeman: $202,465.21; Payable to non-party Trevor Opitz: $1,800.00; Payable to non-party Brett Peterson: $1,350.00; Payable to the California Labor and Workforce Development Agency: $15,750.00. After entry of such Judgment, Plaintiff to move the court for payment of his reasonable attorneys fees and costs as permitted by law.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER RE: MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO STRIKE [DKT Nos. 38,45 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The court believes that Defendant's action were not consistent with the spirit of the discovery rules. At the very least, Defendant would have been well served to call opposing counsel and explaint the change in position and offer to extend discovery. Nevertheless, in the interst of resolving the underlying dispute on the merits, the court will not strike the declarations. Plaintiff's motion to Strike (Dkt. No. 45) is DENIED. The court will, however, reopen discovery as set forth below. Additioanlly, if requested by Plaintiff and subject to a full hearing on possible objections, the court may permit Defendant's objections as to relevance to be submitted to the jury. In light of questions of material fact with respect to Plaintiff's job duties and responsibilities created by the proffered testimony of Freeman, King, and Hill, Plaintiff's Motion for Partial Summ ary Judgment (Dkt. No. 38) is DENIED without prejudice. Modification of Scheduling Order. The court modifies the Scheduling Order as follows: DISCOVERY CUT-OFF: 10/27/14. LAST DAY TO FILE MOTIONS: 11/28/14. FINAL PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE: 2/23/15 AT 11:00 A.M. 203 DAY JURY TRIAL: 3/3/15 AT 9:00 A.M. (bp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
