The Chuck Olsen Co Inc v. F P D Inc et al
| The Chuck Olsen Co Inc |
| Joseph Balcom and F P D Inc |
| 2:2013cv05062 |
| July 15, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Suzanne H. Segal |
| Agriculture Acts |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
188
AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge Dolly M. Gee: Having on this date issued an order granting in part Plaintiff's Motion to Amend/Correct Judgment 187 , the Judgment 152 filed and entered on 11/23/2015 is vacated and superseded as follows: IT IS ORDER ED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: (1) Plaintiff The Chuck Olsen Co., Inc. shall recover of Defendant F.P.D., Inc., the principal amount of $201,422.00 plus prejudgment interest in the amount of $101,117.94, for a total judgment in the su m of $302,539.94; (2) A trust pursuant to the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 7 U.S.C. Sections 499a, et seq., is hereby imposed upon Defendant F.P.D., Inc. such that Defendant F.P.D., Inc. holds its assets for the benefit of, and to pa y the sum of $302,539.94 to, Plaintiff The Chuck Olsen Co., Inc. (3) As the Court has issued its Order granting Third Party Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment, Third-Party Plaintiffs F.P.D., Inc. and Joseph Balcom shall recover of Third-Party Defendant Joseph Pisciotta the sum of $201,422.00. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
