Humberto Carrillo et al v. Marco Antonio Flores-Sanchez et al
Sergio Carrillo, Javier Carrillo and Humberto Carrillo |
Marco Antonio Flores-Sanchez, Does, Victor Alvarez and Jose Luis Magallanes |
2:2013cv05118 |
July 16, 2013 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alicia G. Rosenberg |
George H. Wu |
Trademark |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 STIPULATED JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION 40 by Judge George H. Wu. Plaintiffs and counter-defendants HUMBERTO CARRILLO, SERGIO CARRILLO, and JAVIER CARRILLO, defendant VICTOR ALVAREZ and defendant and counter-complainant MARCO ANTONIO FLORES- SANCHEZ have stipulated to settlement of this action without adjudication of any issue of fact or law. herein. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: 1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action and the parties here to. 2. Judgment is hereby entered in favor of plaintiffs against defendants and each of them as set forth below; all remaining claims against defendants are dismissed pursuant to the separate Dismissal filed by all parties to this action. 3. Judgm ent is hereby entered in favor of counter-complainant against counter-defendants and each of them as set forth below; all remaining claims against counter-defendants are dismissed pursuant to the separate Dismissal filed by all parties to this action. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated) (lom) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.