James Freeman v. American Airlines Inc Long Term Disability Plan et al
| James Freeman |
| Does, American Airlines Inc Long Term Disability Plan and American Airlines Inc |
| 2:2013cv05161 |
| July 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion to Dismiss with twenty days leave to amend and DENIES without prejudice Defendant's request for attorneys' fees. SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE DETAILS. (jre)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO EFFECT SERVICE/FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 11/25/2013. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff, by no later than November 25, 20 13, shall show good cause, if there be any, why service was not timely made on the defendants, and why this case should not be dismissed for failure to effectuate service and/or for lack of prosecution. Failure timely to respond to this Order to Show Cause or to show cause, may be deemed consent to the dismissal of this action and may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to effectuate service and/or for lack of prosecution. (rp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
