Lopez Entertainment Group LLC v. Telemundo Communications Group LLC et al
Lopez Entertainment Group LLC |
Telemundo Network Group LLC, Telemundo Holdings LLC, Telemundo Group LLC, Telemundo Communications Group LLC, Does and Telemundo Network LLC |
2:2013cv05222 |
July 19, 2013 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando M. Olguin |
Michael R. Wilner |
Copyright |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL RE: LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. No later than 6/9/2014, plaintiff shall show cause in writing on or before why defendants Argos Comunicaciones d/b/a Argos Media and Carolco TV should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (vdr) |
Filing 32 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. (See Order for further details) re Stipulation for Protective Order 31 (vm) |
Filing 10 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULE 3-1 by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Plaintiff shall, no later than August 21, 2013, comply with Local Rule 3-1 and file the required document(s). Failure to comply with Local Rule 3-1 or this Order may result in the action being dismissed for failure to prosecute and/or comply with a court order. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). (jloz) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.