The Burlington Insurance Company v. Minadora Holdings LLC et al
| The Burlington Insurance Company |
| Marvin W Durment, Jarvis Enterprises Inc, Minadora Holdings LLC and West Coast Storm Inc |
| 2:2013cv05349 |
| July 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Frederick F. Mumm |
| Insurance |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
171
JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Judgment is now entered in favor of Endurance and against Plaintiffs as to each and every cause of action asserted against Endurance in Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. Judgment is now entered in favor of Burlington and against Plaintiffs as to each and every cause of action asserted against Burlington in Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. Related to: Stipulation for Order 168 . MD JS-6, Case Terminated. (twdb)
|
|
Filing
96
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick re Stipulation for Protective Order 95 . (sp)
|
|
Filing
69
JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff The Burlington Insurance Company(Burlington) and against defendants Minadora Holdings, LLC (Minadora);Jarvis Enterprises, Inc. dba Orange Precision Metal Fabrication (OP); West CoastStorm, Inc. (West Coast) and Marvin W. Durment (Durment). 1. There is and was no coverage for the counterclaims asserted byDurment against OP, Minadora and/or West Coast in Jarvis v. Durment, No. RIC527161 in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Riverside(the Underlying Action) under any insurance policy issued by Burlington;2. Burlington had no duty to defend OP, Minadora or West Coast in theUnderlying Action;3. B urlington has no duty to pay Durment or to indemnify OP, Minadoraor West Coast for any portion of the settlement of the Underlying Action;4. An award of costs may be recovered, in an amount to be determined,following the filing of the appropriate application and the consideration of anyobjections.It is hereby declared and adjudged that: (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
