Dawn Younani v. New England Compounding Pharmacy Inc et al
| Dawn Younani |
| Does, New England Compounding Pharmacy Inc and The Encino Outpatient Surgery Center Inc |
| New England Compounding Pharmacy Inc and Roes |
| The Encino Outpatient Surgery Center Inc |
| 2:2013cv05446 |
| July 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Beverly Reid O'Connell |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE FAILURE TO FILE JOINT REPORT by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. On October 21 2016, the Court set the Rule 26(f) scheduling conference in this matter for January 9, 2017. (Dkt. No. 16.) A Joint Report was ORDERED to be filed not later than 7 days before the scheduling conference. The parties have failed to file the Joint Report. The Court VACATES the Scheduling Conference set for January 9, 2017 at 1:30 p.m. Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should no t be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (court has inherentpower to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). The docket reflects that Plaintiff(s) are not actively pursuing this matter. Plaintiffsmust respond to this order within 20 days. Failure to respond to this OSC will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action. (rfi)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
