Russell Maestro v. United States of America et al
| Russell Maestro |
| Jane Does, John Does, Baltazar Magana and United States of America |
| 2:2013cv05448 |
| July 29, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jacqueline Chooljian |
| Manuel L. Real |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
161
ORDER ACCEPTING THE PARTIES' STIPULATION FOR COMPROMISE SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE OF ALL CLAIMS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. SECTION 2677 AND DISMISSING THE CASE WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Manuel L. Real: The Stipulation for Compromise Settlement and Release of All Claims filed by the parties 160 is accepted by the Court. This case is dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear its own fees, costs, and expenses. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
|
|
Filing
142
ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSION, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Manuel L. Real for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 139 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: (1) Plaintiff's Motions to Strike evidence are deni ed; (2) the Magana Motion is granted; (3) the Joint Motion is granted; (4) Plaintiff's Motion is denied; and, in light of the foregoing, (5) this action will proceed solely on plaintiff's remaining FTCA claim against the United States. Magana MOTION for Summary Judgment 63 , Joint MOTION for Summary Judgment 112 , Plaintiff's MOTION for Summary Judgment 129 . (dml)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
