Keith Thomas v. Matthew Cate

Keith Thomas v. Matthew Cate

Petitioner:	Keith Thomas
Respondent:	Matthew Cate
Case Number:	2:2013cv05514
Filed:	July 31, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge:	R. Gary Klausner
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 7, 2013	Filing 3 ORDER RE: SUMMARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Based on the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The case is summarily dismissed for lack of exhaustion, want of jurisdiction due to Thomas' lack of standing, and failure to se t forth a short and plain statement of the grounds for habeas jurisdiction. See Rule 4 of the Rule Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts; Local Rule 72-3.2. 2. In the event Wilkin, Bookman, or Baker wish to personall y file a habeas claim challenging the legality of a conviction and/or his confinement, the Clerk is directed to send Thomas three blank copies of the Central District's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody. Any habeas petition personally filed by Wilkin, Bookman, or Baker must comply with the instructions provided on the Central District of California's habeas form and must contain complete answers for all sections on the form, including informati on concerning the conviction being challenged. Any petition must also be fully exhausted and personally signed by the petitioner under penalty of perjury. *See attached Order for details.* Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (Attachments: # 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus By A Person In State Custody (3 Blank Petitions)) (es)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 7, 2013

Filing 3 ORDER RE: SUMMARY DISMISSAL OF ACTION by Judge R. Gary Klausner. Based on the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. The case is summarily dismissed for lack of exhaustion, want of jurisdiction due to Thomas' lack of standing, and failure to se t forth a short and plain statement of the grounds for habeas jurisdiction. See Rule 4 of the Rule Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts; Local Rule 72-3.2. 2. In the event Wilkin, Bookman, or Baker wish to personall y file a habeas claim challenging the legality of a conviction and/or his confinement, the Clerk is directed to send Thomas three blank copies of the Central District's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody. Any habeas petition personally filed by Wilkin, Bookman, or Baker must comply with the instructions provided on the Central District of California's habeas form and must contain complete answers for all sections on the form, including informati on concerning the conviction being challenged. Any petition must also be fully exhausted and personally signed by the petitioner under penalty of perjury. ***See attached Order for details.*** Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (Attachments: # 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus By A Person In State Custody (3 Blank Petitions)) (es)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Keith Thomas v. Matthew Cate
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Keith Thomas
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Matthew Cate
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?