Cobra Systems Inc v. Accuform Manufacturing Inc et al
Plaintiff: |
Cobra Systems Inc |
Defendant: |
Accuform Manufacturing Inc and Does |
Case Number: |
2:2013cv05932 |
Filed: |
August 14, 2013 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Presiding Judge: |
John E. McDermott |
Presiding Judge: |
Otis D. Wright |
Nature of Suit: |
Copyright |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
May 1, 2014 |
Filing
80
ORDER STRIKING JOINT MOTION FOR DISMISSAL 79 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The parties to this Motion may file a renewed motion, if necessary,after a meet and confer with Accuform in compliance with Local Rule 7-3. Any renewed motion must be filed by the deadline set forth in this Courts previous Orderto Show Cause. (lc). Modified on 5/2/2014. (lc).
|
April 16, 2014 |
Filing
78
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:In light of the Notice of Settlement filed in this case (ECF No. 77), the Court hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing no later than Tuesday, May 20, 2014, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held on this matter. All other dates are VACATED and taken off calendarthis includes deadlines for discovery. This Order to Show Cause will be vacated upon the filing of a stipulation to dismiss and proposed order of dismissal (lc)
|
January 14, 2014 |
Filing
51
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS 38 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court hereby STRIKES the fifth affirmative defense for fraud and DISMISSES the second counterclaim for fraud in the Amended Answer and Counterclaims. The Court also STRIKES and/or fraudulently from paragraph 113 of the Amended Answer and Counterclaims. The remainder of the Motion is DENIED. (lc). Modified on 1/14/2014 .(lc).
|
January 9, 2014 |
Filing
50
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART COBRAS MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION 20 . Cobra has also filed a Motion to Strike the Abramson Declaration filed by Accuform in opposition to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction. The Court DENIES AS M OOT the Motion to Strike 30 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court hereby enjoins Accuform from relabeling existing VnM printers and modifying existing VnM printers to operate with Accuforms Spitfire software. The Court also orders Accuform to sup ply Cobra with a list of the VnM printers that were relabeled and modified, so that Cobra may contact those customers, if it so chooses, and offer to restore the printers to their original state. The Court finds that the issuance of a bond is unnecessary based on the low number of printers actually involved in this injunction and likely de minimis expense to be incurred by Accuform to comply with this injunction. (lc). Modified on 1/9/2014. (lc).
|
January 7, 2014 |
Filing
48
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge John E. McDermott 47 . (san)
|
November 13, 2013 |
Filing
28
ORDER DENYING COBRA SYSTEMS MOTION TO STRIKE AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS 17 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 11/13/2013 (lc).
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?