Wells Fargo Bank NA v. Hellberg et al
| Wells Fargo Bank NA |
| Magnus Hellberg, Tracie Hellberg and Does 1 to 10 |
| 2:2013cv06575 |
| September 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Stephen J Hillman |
| Christina A Snyder |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2013. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Receipt of Copy of Remand Transmittal Letter from Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. 13R05933, acknowledged on 9/23/2013. (gk) |
| Filing 10 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder RE: Plaintiff's Motion to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court #6 . It appears that this Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case, and therefore this case is remanded to the Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. 13R05933. Defendants are admonished to comply with applicable law governing removal to federal court. Additional unwarranted removals in this case may result in monetary sanctions. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order on defendants no later than 9/26/2013. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated. ) Court Reporter: N/A. (Attachments: #1 CV-103 Remand Transmittal Letter) (gk) |
Filing 9
ORDER ON EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR ORDER SHORTENING TIME FOR HEARING ON MOTION FOR REMAND TO STATE COURT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Upon Plaintiff's Ex Parte Application for Order Shortening Time for Hearing on Motion for Remand to State Court #7 , the Court hereby ORDERS that the Application be GRANTED and the motion #6 taken UNDER SUBMISSION. (gk)
|
| Filing 8 CORRECTED PROOF OF SERVICE OF PROPOSED ORDER ATTACHED TO EX PARTE APPLICATION OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank NA, re EX PARTE APPLICATION to Shorten Time for Hearing on Motion for Remand to State Court; Memorandum of Points and Authorities #7 served on 9/12/2013. (Freedman, Kenneth) |
| Filing 7 EX PARTE APPLICATION to Shorten Time for Hearing on Motion for Remand to State Court; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank NA. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Freedman, Kenneth) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Remand Case to Los Angeles Superior Court, Santa Monica Courthouse filed by Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank NA. (Freedman, Kenneth) |
| Filing 5 OBJECTIONS to Notice of Removal, #1 Plaintiff's Opposition to Removal of Action filed by Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank NA. (Freedman, Kenneth) |
| Filing 4 Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank NA, identifying Wells Fargo Bank NA, as Attorney-in-fact for Bank of America National Association as Successor by Merger to La Salle National Association as Trustee for Morgan Stanley Mortgage Loan Trusts 2006-6AR. (Freedman, Kenneth) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed.(esa) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATION AND NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES filed by defendants Tracie Hellberg, Magnus Hellberg. (esa) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from the Superior Court of CA, Los Angeles County, case number 13R05933 with conformed copies of summons and complaint. Case assigned to Judge Christina A. Snyder, discovery to Magistrate Judge Stephen J. Hillman; (Filing fee $ 400 PAID ); filed by defendants Tracie Hellberg, Magnus Hellberg.(esa) |
| CONFORMED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, #1 filed by defendants Tracie Hellberg, Magnus Hellberg.(esa) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
