John Mitchell v. Medtronic Inc
Plaintiff: John Mitchell
Defendant: Medtronic Inc
Case Number: 2:2013cv06624
Filed: September 10, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge: Michael W. Fitzgerald
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 15, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 48 JUDGMENT entered by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald in favor of Plaintiff John Mitchell and against Medtronic, Inc., pursuant to the Notice of Acceptance of Offer of Judgment 47 and F.R.C.P. 68. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated) (cw)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: John Mitchell v. Medtronic Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Medtronic Inc
Represented By: Noah B Steinsapir
Represented By: Ruth Zadikany
Represented By: John P Zaimes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: John Mitchell
Represented By: Megan Emslie Ross
Represented By: Michael L Tracy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?