Oscar Gates v. Warden at San Quentin
Petitioner: Oscar Gates
Respondent: Warden at San Quentin
Case Number: 2:2013cv06995
Filed: September 20, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Paul L. Abrams
Presiding Judge: Manuel L. Real
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Manuel L. Real. Accordingly, it is ordered that petitioner's Motion for Corrections (docket no. 5) is GRANTED, this action is dismissed, and the declaration construed herein as a new habeas petition shall be filed in case numbers CV 94-2560 and CV 94-5484. It is so ordered. **See Order for details.**, Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (ch)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Oscar Gates v. Warden at San Quentin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Warden at San Quentin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Oscar Gates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?