Munchkin, Inc. v. Luv N'Care, Ltd. et al
Munchkin, Inc. |
Admar International, Inc. and Luv N'Care, Ltd. |
2:2013cv07228 |
September 30, 2013 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Alicia G. Rosenberg |
Otis D. Wright |
Patent |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 149 ORDER RULING ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion in Limine No. 1. 120 . The Court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion in Limine No. 2. 121 . The Court GRANTS Plaintiffs Motion in Limine No. 3. 123 . Defendants M otion in Limine No. 1 is MOOT 118 . The Court DENIES Defendants Motion in Limine No. 2. 122 . The Court DENIES Defendants Motion in Limine No. 3. 126 . In light of these rulings and as expressed during the hearing, the Court orders the parties to c onduct a settlement hearing before trial with either Magistrate Judge Rosenberg or another third party. The parties will notify the Court when a settlement hearing is scheduled as well as file a joint status of settlement describing the outcome of that hearing. (lc) |
Filing 148 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE LATE DISCLOSED WITNESSES AND EVIDENCE 76 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. For the reasons above, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Late- Disclosed Witnesses and Evidence. (lom) |
Filing 42 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 9/12/2014 (lc). |
Filing 31 PROTECTIVE ORDER 30 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.