MyMedicalRecords Inc v. WebMD Health Corp et al
Plaintiff: MyMedicalRecords Inc
Defendant: WebMD Health Corp and WebMD Health Services Group Inc
Case Number: 2:2013cv07285
Filed: October 2, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Stephen J. Hillman
Presiding Judge: Otis D. Wright
Nature of Suit: Patent

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 112 ORDER DENYING SANCTIONS AGAINST PLAINTIFF by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 9/16/2015 (lc).
April 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 97 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: denying 88 Motion for Attorney Fees ; denying 94 Request to Stay Case. The Court DENIES the Defendants Motion for Attorney Fees and DENIES Plaintiffs Motion to Stay. (ECF Nos. 88, 94; C ase No. 2:13-cv-03560, ECF Nos. 116, 123.) The Court Orders MMR to show cause why MMR should not be sanctioned in the form of attorney fees for opposing Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment on Invalidity of the 883 Patent. Defendants may also submit arguments for why MMR should be sanctioned. Both parties will file their responses, not to exceed five pages, imultaneously by May 8, 2015. (shb)
December 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OF INVALIDITY OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,301,466 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court finds that the asserted claims of the 466 Patent are patent ineligible, and Defendants Motion for Judgme nt on the Pleadings is GRANTED without leave to amend. Defendants are directed to submit a proposed judgment by January 8. 2015. All hearing dates in the above captioned cases are VACATED and all pending motions 58 in the above captioned cases are MOOT. (lc). Modified on 12/23/2014 .(lc). Modified on 12/23/2014 (lc).
December 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF INVALIDITY OF U.S. PATENT NO. 8,498,883 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, (lc). Modified on 12/22/2014. (lc).
November 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 54 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 48 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 11/7/2014 (lc).
September 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 46 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc) .Modified on 9/3/2014 (lc).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MyMedicalRecords Inc v. WebMD Health Corp et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MyMedicalRecords Inc
Represented By: Ryan E Hatch
Represented By: Randall J Sunshine
Represented By: Ted S Ward
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WebMD Health Corp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WebMD Health Services Group Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?