Patient One et al v. UnitedHealth Group Inc et al
Patient One and Patient Two |
BNSF Railway Company, Does, Ingenix Inc, Pacific Bell Telephone Company, United Healthcare Insurance Company Inc, United Healthcare Services Inc and UnitedHealth Group Inc |
2:2013cv07369 |
October 4, 2013 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Gary A. Feess |
Patrick J. Walsh |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 93 ORDER RE SANCTIONS FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDER by Judge Fernando M. Olguin. Show Cause Hearing set for 4/21/2016 10:00 AM before Judge Fernando M. Olguin. (jloz) |
Filing 68 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Patrick J. Walsh. (See document for further details). re Stipulation for Order 67 (sbou) |
Filing 25 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Gary A. Feess: Order to Show Cause re: Joinder of Parties. Plaintiffs are hereby ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why this case should not be dismissed without prejudice to allow each PlaintiffPatient One in one case, and Pat ient Two in anotherto bring her own lawsuit against Defendants. A memorandum explaining why joinder is permissible in this suit shall be deemed an adequate response to this order. Plaintiffs shall file their response, not to exceed four pages, on or before Friday, November 8, 2013. Failure to respond to this Order will be deemed consent to dismissal without prejudice. See document for details. (smo) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.