Kamsult Inc v. Kama Sutra Closet LLC et al
| Kamsult Inc |
| Kama Sutra Closet LLC, Roylin Downs and Does |
| 2:2013cv07403 |
| October 7, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Charles F. Eick |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER ON STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF ACTION by Judge Percy Anderson: Upon Stipulation 28 , IT IS ORDERED that this action be dismissed in its entirety and as to all parties and causes of action without prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and fees incurred against one another. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
|
|
Filing
23
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Percy Anderson. Refer to document for details of the Court's order. (pso)
|
|
Filing
10
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson RE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before December 2, 2013, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. Pursuan t to Rule 78 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. The Order to Show Cause will stand submitted upon the filing of plaintiff's response. Failure to respond to this Order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including but not limited to dismissal of the complaint. (pso)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
