Hollyway Cleaners & Laundry Company Inc et al v. Central National Insurance Company of Omaha Inc et al
Plaintiff: Burton Chortkoff, Edythe Chortkoff, Milton Chortkoff, Wilma Chortkoff and Hollyway Cleaners & Laundry Company Inc
Defendant: Central National Insurance Company of Omaha Inc and Does
Case Number: 2:2013cv07497
Filed: October 9, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Charles F. Eick
Presiding Judge: Otis D. Wright
Nature of Suit: Insurance

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 13, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 178 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AS TO THE FIRST PHASE OF TRIAL signed by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer, and submit a revised Proposed Pretrial Conference Order before October 1, 2018. The Court sets a Pretrial Conference for October 22, 2018, at 1:30 p.m., and Trial for October 30, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. (lc). Modified on 8/13/2018. (lc).
April 4, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 171 ORDER EXCLUDING FORM PCL 7-81 FROM POLICY AND SETTING BENCH TRIAL ON COVERAGE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:Court sets the first phase of trial for 9:00 a.m., on May 15, 2018. To the extent the parties have significant scheduling conflicts, they may meet and confer, and jointly request a different date convenient for all parties, but must do so, if at all, before April 20, 2018. (lc). Modified on 4/5/2018. (lc).
December 6, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 98 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 94 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II . (lc). Modified on 12/6/2016 (lc).
November 7, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 93 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 84 , DENYING PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 90 , AND DENYING DEFENDANTS REQUEST TO DELAY OR DENY PLAINTIFFS RENEWED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 85 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II . (lc). Modified on 11/8/2016 (lc).
April 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 65 ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court finds that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact regarding the absence of Defendants duty to defend. As a result, the Court need not address issues of breach and bad faith. For the reasons discussed above, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, and GRANTS Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF Nos. 17, 23.) MD JS-6. Case Terminated. (shb)
May 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER DENYING plaintiffs EX PARTE APPLICATION requesting the Court continue the expert-disclosure deadlines. In the alternative, Plaintiffs request that the Court exclude all evidence from one of Central National Insurance Company of Omahas experts 12 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II . (lc). Modified on 5/28/2014 (lc).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hollyway Cleaners & Laundry Company Inc et al v. Central National Insurance Company of Omaha Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Central National Insurance Company of Omaha Inc
Represented By: Robert C Baker
Represented By: Melissa S Fink
Represented By: Derrick S Lowe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Burton Chortkoff
Represented By: Brian R Paget
Represented By: Bret A Stone
Represented By: John R Till
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edythe Chortkoff
Represented By: Brian R Paget
Represented By: Bret A Stone
Represented By: John R Till
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Milton Chortkoff
Represented By: Brian R Paget
Represented By: Bret A Stone
Represented By: John R Till
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Wilma Chortkoff
Represented By: Brian R Paget
Represented By: Bret A Stone
Represented By: John R Till
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hollyway Cleaners & Laundry Company Inc
Represented By: Brian R Paget
Represented By: Bret A Stone
Represented By: John R Till
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?