Cochise Bahar Lee v. G D Lewis

Cochise Bahar Lee v. G D Lewis

Petitioner:	Cochise Bahar Lee
Respondent:	G D Lewis
Case Number:	2:2013cv07725
Filed:	October 18, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Margaret A. Nagle
Presiding Judge:	Virginia A. Phillips
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 29, 2017	Filing 59 JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 58 . Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition in this matter is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (mp)
March 31, 2016	Filing 40 ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for a stay is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, subject to the following terms and con ditions: 1. Petitioner shall file a habeas petition before the California Supreme Court that exhausts any unexhausted allegations within 30 days after entry of an order accepting this recommendation; 2. Petitioner shall file a status report in thi s court within 30 days after filing the petition in California Supreme Court. The status report shall notify this court of the case number assigned by the state court; and 3. Petitioner shall file a status report within 10 days after he receives a copy of the California Supreme Court's decision on his petition. (See Order for Further Details) (kl)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 29, 2017

Filing 59 JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations 58 . Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, IT IS ADJUDGED that the Petition in this matter is denied and dismissed with prejudice. (mp)

March 31, 2016

Filing 40 ORDER ACCEPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge Virginia A. Phillips. IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's motion for a stay is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, subject to the following terms and con ditions: 1. Petitioner shall file a habeas petition before the California Supreme Court that exhausts any unexhausted allegations within 30 days after entry of an order accepting this recommendation; 2. Petitioner shall file a status report in thi s court within 30 days after filing the petition in California Supreme Court. The status report shall notify this court of the case number assigned by the state court; and 3. Petitioner shall file a status report within 10 days after he receives a copy of the California Supreme Court's decision on his petition. (See Order for Further Details) (kl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cochise Bahar Lee v. G D Lewis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Cochise Bahar Lee
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: G D Lewis
Represented By:	Elaine F Tumonis
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?