Sprint Solutions Inc et al v. Pacific Cellupage Inc et al
| Sprint Communications Company LP and Sprint Solutions Inc |
| Navid Davidian, Pacific Cellupage Inc, Daniel Saghian and Yousef Saghian |
| 2:2013cv07862 |
| October 24, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jay C. Gandhi |
| Christina A. Snyder |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
129
FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION 128 by Judge Christina A. Snyder. Final judgment is hereby entered against Defendant Pacific Cellupage, Inc., and in favor of the Plaintiffs, on the claims set forth in Plaintiffs' Complaint. Defendant Pacific Cellupage, Inc. has paid to Plaintiffs the sum of Two Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars and no cents ($250,000.00) pursuant to a confidential settlement agreement between the parties, as evidenced by the copy of the settlement check attached to the Stipulation and Joint Motion for Entry of Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction filed in this case. (See attached document for details.) (lom)
|
|
Filing
82
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING THE HANDLING OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi 80 . (twdb)
|
|
Filing
49
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Christina A. Snyder. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that PLAINTIFF show cause in writing not later than June 6, 2014 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to defendants. SEE ORDER. (im)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
