Shira Kronfeld v. US Airways Inc et al
Shira Kronfeld |
Does and US Airways Inc |
2:2013cv08066 |
October 31, 2013 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Jacqueline Chooljian |
Dean D. Pregerson |
Airplane |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 106 JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL ACTION by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Pursuant to that verdict, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that: 1. Judgment shall be entered in favor of plaintiff Shira Kronfeld and against defendant US Airways, Inc. as follows: a. Past Economic Damages: $ 50,000; b. Future Economic Damages: $ 75,000; c. Past Non-Economic Damages: $ 15,000; d. Future Non-Economic Damages: $ 15,000; Total: $155,000. 2. This judgment shall bear interest at the statutory rate until it is paid; and 3. Plaintiff Shira Kronfeld may file a bill of costs incurred in this action in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 54(d). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (vv) |
Filing 25 ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER 24 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: The fact discovery cut-off date to July 6, 2015, subject to the limitations stated in the stipulation. However, the Court also notes that this is the third time the discovery cut-off has been extended. (See Dkt. Nos. 20-23.) There will be no further continuances of this deadline. (lc). Modified on 5/21/2015 (lc). |
Filing 18 AMENDED STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian re Amended Document (Non-Motion) 17 . See order for details. (hr) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.