Board of Trustees of the Southern California Local 831 Employer Health Fund et al v. Exhibit Installation Specialists Inc et al
| Employer Health Fund, Board of Trustees of the Southern California Local 831 Employer Health Fund and The Employer Training and Re-Training Fund |
| Exhibit Installation Specialists Inc and Does |
| 2:2013cv08236 |
| November 6, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Suzanne H. Segal |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
23
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT 17 and awards The Board of Trustees a total of $207,696.53 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 4/23/2014 (lc).
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER SETTING DEFAULT JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: To ensure an expeditious resolution of this matter, the Court ORDERS Plaintiffs to move for entry of default with the Clerk by Friday, March 14, 2014. Plaintiffs shall ther eafter file an appropriately noticed default-judgment motion not later than 14 days following the Clerks entry of default. In the event that Defendant answers during the briefing period, that answer will take precedence. Failure to timely comply this briefing schedule will result in dismissal for lack of prosecution. (lc). Modified on 3/7/2014 .(lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
