Robin Lambert v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
||Does, National Railroad Passenger Corporation and Diane Pitts
||November 8, 2013
||US District Court for the Central District of California
||Margaret A. Nagle
||Dean D. Pregerson
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights: Jobs
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 19, 2015
ORDER VACATING PREVIOUS ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: On April 29, 2014, the Court issued an order ruling on Defendants motion for summary judgment 52 . However, Defendants now inform the Court that the parties had reached a settlement agreemen t shortly before the order was issued, that Defendant gave up its right to move for reconsideration as part of the settlement, and that Plaintiff does not oppose vacatur. Because the parties settled before the order was issued, the Court VACATES the order as mooted by the settlement agreement. The Court does not reach the question of error raised in the motion to vacate.The MOTION TO VACATE ORDER 55 set for June 15, 2015 at 10:00 a.m., is hereby taken off calendar, the hearing date vacated and GRANTED. (lc) Modified on 5/19/2015 (lc).
|April 29, 2015
ORDER RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT 22 by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: Plaintiffs Third and Seventh Causes of Action are dismissed.Defendant Pitts is dismissed from the case. Defendant Amtraks motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to the remaining Causes of Action. (lc). Modified on 4/30/2015 (lc).
|November 24, 2014
ORDER by Judge Dean D. Pregerson: granting 17 Ex Parte Application that the scheduling order is hereby modified with the dates continued as follows:FACT DISCOVERY CUT-OFF: 3/13/15;EXPERT DISCOVERY CUT-OFF: 1/26/15;LAST DAY TO FILE MOTIONS: 3/9/15;FINAL PRE TRIAL CONFERENCE: 6/1/15, at 11:00 a.m.;6 DAY JURY TRIAL: 6/9/15, at 9:00 a.m. (lc). Modified on 11/24/2014 .(lc).
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?