Coach, Inc. et al v. Ralphs Grocery Company et al
| Coach, Inc. and Coach Services, Inc. |
| Does and Ralphs Grocery Company |
| 2:2013cv08602 |
| November 21, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jay C. Gandhi |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: Parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than Monday, December 22, 2014, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. All other dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. (lc)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE. SETTLEMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II:In light of the Notice of Settlement (ECF No. 37), the Court hereby ORDERS the parties TO SHOW CAUSE, in writing, no later than Monday, December 15, 2014, why settlement has not been finalized. No hearing will be held. All other dates and deadlines in this action are VACATED and taken off calendar. The Court will discharge this Order upon the filing of a dismissal that complies with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41. (lc)
|
|
Filing
32
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jay C. Gandhi re Stipulation for Protective Order 31 . (twdb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
