United States of America v. $5,437,986.06 In Bank Funds et al
United States of America |
$5,437,986.06 In Bank Funds and $32,886.36 In Bank Funds |
Absolute Funds Claimants |
2:2013cv08685 |
November 25, 2013 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
George H. King |
Ralph Zarefsky |
Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 CONSENT JUDGMENT OF FORFEITURE by Judge George H. King. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: This Court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action. Notice of this action has been given in accordance with law. All potentia l claimants to the defendant Cook Islands Funds, other than The Absolute Funds; Todd M. Ficeto; Charles Ficeto, as trustee of Morgan Inter Vivos Settlement Trust; and Christina Ficeto, are deemed to have admitted the allegations of the Complaint. The allegations set out in the Complaint are sufficient to establish a basis for forfeiture. The Absolute Funds are relieved of their obligations to file an answer in this litigation. The United States of America shall have judgment as to the remaining $4,920,872.42, plus the interest earned by the United States on the entire amount of Cook Islands Funds since seizure (the "Forteitable Cook Islands Funds"), and no other person or entity shall have any right, title or interest therein. The United States Marshals Service is ordered to depose of said funds in accordance with law. (bp) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.