Floyd Hills Nelson v. County of Los Angeles et al
| Floyd Hills Nelson |
| Lydia Almarez, David C. Bates, Bell, Dave L. Casebeer, County of Los Angeles, Daniel Cruz, Karen S. Dalton, Does, Jeff D. Enfield, Robby M. Ibene, Robert Lee, Los Angeles County Sheriff Department, Rae Martinez, Jay R. Stroh and Alexander Yim |
| 2:2013cv08913 |
| December 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Unassigned |
| Jean P. Rosenbluth |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
134
ORDER OF DISMISSAL AND WAIVER OF ATTORNEY FEES; AND ORDER OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT OF DISMISSAL by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: Upon Stipulation 132 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civ il Procedure, the lawsuit of FLOYD HILLS NELSON is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that all scheduled dates, including those set for the pretrial conference and/or trial are hereby VACATED. Each party hereby waives any and all claims for attorneys' fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Section 1988, and shall bear his own costs. A Judgment of Dismissal is hereby entered in this matter pursuant to the Joint Stipulation of Dismissal executed by the Plaintiff and the Defendants. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
