Rondel Delbert Gardner v. CDCR Dental Staff et al
| Rondel Delbert Gardner |
| CDCR Dental Staff, Dr McQuater and Dr Weu |
| 2:2013cv09013 |
| December 6, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Valerie Baker Fairbank |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank, re Stipulation to Dismiss Case 115 . In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this action is dismissed with prejudice. Each party is to bear his own costs, fees, and expenses of any type, including attorney's fees. There is no prevailing party in this action. The Court retains jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcement of the terms of the settlement agreement between the parties. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (mp)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER Adopting the Report and Recommendation of the U.S. Magistrate Judge 51 and Directing that the Second Amended Complaint Be Filed as of August 24, 2015 by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. IT IS ORDERED that the Second Amended Complaint be deemed filed on August 24, 2015, the date it was received. The Court refers the matter back to the magistrate judge for further pre-trial proceedings. (See Order for Further Details) (kl)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
