Thomas E. Perez v. Unified Nutrimeals et al
Thomas E. Perez |
Hugo Meza, Shabir Kashyap, Philip Chavez and Unified Nutrimeals |
2:2013cv09104 |
December 10, 2013 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Percy Anderson |
Margaret A. Nagle |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 FIRST AMENDED CONSENT JUDGMENT 8 by Judge Percy Anderson: The Court directs the entry of this Modification to the 12/18/2013, Consent Judgment as a final order, replacing the Exhibit 2 attached to the 12/18/2013, Consent Judgment with the attached Amended Exhibit 2. See document for details. (gk) |
Filing 8 CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge Percy Anderson: It is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Defendants, Unified Nutrimeals, a California Corporation, Shabir Kashyap, individually and as managing agent of corporate defendant Unified Nutrimeals, Hugo Meza, individually and as managing agent of corporate defendant Unified Nutrimeals and Philip Chavez, individually and as managing agent of corporate defendant Unified Nutrimeals, their officers, agents, servants, and employees and those persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this order (by personal service or otherwise) be, and they hereby are, permanently enjoined and restrained from violating the provisions of Sections 15(a)(2) and 15(a)(5) of the FLSA, 2 9 U.S.C. Sections 215(a)(2) and 215(a)(5), etc. Defendants, jointly and severally, shall not continue to withhold the payment of $133,797, the balance of $166,797 in overtime pay hereby found to be due under the FLSA to 92 employees, as a r esult of their employment by Defendants during the period of 7/16/2009 through 7/13/2012. ORDERED that each party shall bear its own fees and other expenses incurred by such party in connection with any stage of this proceeding, including but not limited to attorneys' fees, which may be available under the Equal Access to Justice Act, as amended. See document for details. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (gk) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.