Jessica Aparicio v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc et al
Jessica Aparicio |
Abercrombie & Fitch Stores Inc and Does |
2:2013cv09209 |
December 13, 2013 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Charles F. Eick |
Margaret M. Morrow |
Labor: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 MINUTE ORDER (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction by Judge Margaret M. Morrow: On January 16, 2013, Jessica Aparicio filed this putative class action in Los Angeles Superior Cou rt against Abercrombie & Fitch Stores ("Abercrombie") and certain fictitious defendants...........Abercrombie has failed to demonstrate the existence of minimal diversity and has failed to show by a preponderance of the evidence that the jurisdictional amount is satisfied. See Rodriguez v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC, 728 F.3d 975, 981 (9th Cir. 2013). The court accordingly orders Abercrombie to show cause on or before February 18, 2014 why this action should not be remanded to Los An geles Superior Court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff may file a reply on or be fore February 25, 2014. Abercrombie's failure to respond by February 18, 2014 will result in immediate remand without further notice. (PLEASE REVIEW DOCUMENT FOR FULL AND COMPLETE DETAILS) ( Response to Order to Show Cause due by 2/18/2014.) (lw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.