Eclipse IP LLC v. Google, Inc. et al
Eclipse IP LLC |
Google, Inc. and Waze, Inc. |
2:2013cv09502 |
December 27, 2013 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Paul L. Abrams |
Otis D. Wright |
Patent |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 42 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: # 1 dismissal order) (lc) |
Filing 41 ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II, re Stipulation 40 Plaintiffs claims for relief against Google are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all attorneys fees, costs of court and expenses shall be borne by each party incurring the same. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lc) |
Filing 40 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) filed by Plaintiff Eclipse IP LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Olavi, Matt) |
Filing 39 SEALED DOCUMENT-GOOGLE INC'S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL AND FOR A TEMPORARY STAY.(lc) |
Filing 38 ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE INC.S APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 79-5 36 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Clerk shall enter a redacted version of Defendant Google Inc.s Reply brief in support of its Motion To Disqualify Plaintiffs Counsel And For Temporary Stay, on the public docket and maintain under seal the confidential versions that are not redacted. (lc) |
Filing 37 OF SERVICE filed by Defendants Google, Inc., Waze, Inc., re APPLICATION for Leave to File Under Seal Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5 36 served on 5/19/2014. (Berta, Michael) |
Filing 36 APPLICATION for Leave to File Under Seal Pursuant to Local Rule 79-5 filed by Defendants Google, Inc., Waze, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Berta, Michael) |
Filing 35 SEALED DOCUMENT-DECLARATION OF BRIAN DUNNE IN SUPPORT OF ECLIPSE IP LLCS OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE INC.S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL AND FOR AT EMPORARY STAY (lc) Modified on 5/14/2014 (lc). |
Filing 34 SEALED DOCUMENT-DECLARATION OF MATT OLAVI IN SUPPORT OF ECLIPSE IP LLCS OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE INC.S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL AND FOR A TEMPORARY STAY (lc) Modified on 5/14/2014 (lc). |
Filing 33 SEALED DOCUMENT-ECLIPSE IP LLCS OPPOSITION TO GOOGLE INC.S MOTION TODISQUALIFY PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL AND FOR A TEMPORARY STAY(lc) |
Filing 32 ORDER GRANTING ECLIPSE IP LLCS APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TOLOCAL RULE 79-5 30 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Clerk shall enter a redacted version of Plaintiff Eclipse IP LLCs Opposition to Google, Inc.s Motion To Disqualify Plaintiffs Counsel And For Temporary Stay, as well as the Declarations of Matt Olavi and Brian Dunne In Support Of Eclipse IP LLCs Opposition, on the public docket and maintain under seal the confidential versions that are not redacted. (lc) |
Filing 31 PUBLIC REDACTED Opposition In Opposition To re: MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Brian Dunne, Matthew Olavi and the law firm of Olavi Dunne LLP 24 filed by Plaintiff Eclipse IP LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Public Redacted Declaration of Matt Olavi, # 2 Olavi Decl. Exh. 1, # 3 Olavi Decl. Exh. 2, # 4 Olavi Decl. Exh. 3, # 5 Olavi Decl. Exh. 4, # 6 Olavi Decl. Exh. 5, # 7 Olavi Decl. Exh. 6, # 8 Olavi Decl. Exh. 7, # 9 Olavi Decl. Exh. 8, # 10 Olavi Decl. Exh. 9, # 11 Olavi Decl. Exh. 10, # 12 Olavi Decl. Exh. 11, # 13 Olavi Decl. Exh. 12, # 14 Olavi Decl. Exh. 13, # 15 Olavi Decl. Exh. 14, # 16 Olavi Decl. Exh. 15, # 17 Olavi Decl. Exh. 16, # 18 Olavi Decl. Exh. 17, # 19 Public Redacted Declaration of Brian Dunne, # 20 Certificate of Service)(Olavi, Matt) |
Filing 30 APPLICATION for Leave to File Documents Under Seal filed by Plaintiff Eclipse IP LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Olavi, Matt) |
Filing 29 **Text Only Entry** MINUTES (In Chambers) by Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. This case has been referred to Magistrate Judge Abrams for settlement. IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) confer with each other and set a date and time for a settlement conference, after clearing the date with Magistrate Judge Abrams' clerk, Christianna Howard, (213) 894-7103. The date selected must be soon enough to comply with any deadlines imposed by the District Judge, BUT NOT BEFORE THE PARTIES HAVE ENGAGED IN SUFFICIENT DISCUSSIONS TO MAKE A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE MEANINGFUL. In general, the parties should contact the court clerk at least 30 days prior to the date on which they wish to hold the settlement conference. Please note that settlement conferences are usually conducted on Thursdays and begin at 9:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (ch) TEXT ONLY ENTRY |
Filing 28 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 1 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. Case ordered to Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams for Settlement Conference. (lc) |
Filing 27 SCHEDULING AND CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright II: THE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE IS VACATED. SEE THE LAST PAGE OF THIS ORDER FOR THE SPECIFIED DATES. Jury trial: 6/16/15 9:00 AM; File final trial exhibit stipulation: 6/11/15; hearing on motions in limine: 6/8/15 2:30 PM; Final Pretrial Conference: 5/26/15 2:30 PM; motions in limine, proposed voir dire questions and proposed voir dire questions and agreed to statement of case: 5/26/15; lodged Pretrial conference order and pretrial exhibit stipulation, file contentions of fact and law, exhibit and witness lists, status report regarding settlement, agreed upon set of instructions and verdict forms, joint statement regarding disputed instructions verdicts etc: 5/18/15; last day for hearing motions: 4/27/15; last date to conduct settlement conference: 4/20/15; discovery cutoff: 3/16/15. Claim Construction hearing: 11/14/14 11:00 AM (see last page for other Claim Construction dates and other deadlines) (lc) |
Filing 26 AGREED JOINT PROTECTIVE ORDER 25 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) |
Filing 25 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 to 7 days, filed by Plaintiff Eclipse IP LLC.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Agreed Joint Protective Order)(Olavi, Matt) |
Filing 24 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Disqualify Counsel Brian Dunne, Matthew Olavi and the law firm of Olavi Dunne LLP filed by Defendants Google, Inc., Waze, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 6/2/2014 at 01:30 PM before Judge Otis D. Wright II. (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum In Support of Motion to Disqualify Plaintiff's Counsel REDACTED, # 2 Declaration Michael A. Berta, # 3 Exhibit A to Berta Declaration, # 4 Exhibit B to Berta Declaration, # 5 Exhibit C to Berta Declaration, # 6 Exhibit D to Berta Declaration, # 7 Exhibit E to Berta Declaration, # 8 Declaration of Matthew S. Warren REDACTED, # 9 Exhibit A to Warren Declaration, # 10 Exhibit B to Warren Declaration, # 11 Proposed Order re Motion to Disqualify Plaintiff's Counsel)(Berta, Michael) |
Filing 23 SEALED DOCUMENT-DECLARATION OF MATTHEW S WARREN IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE INCS MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL(lc) |
Filing 22 SEALED DOCUMENT: GOOGLE INCS MOTION TO DISQUALIFY PLAINTIFFS COUNSEL AND FOR A TEMPORARY STAY (lc) |
Filing 21 ORDER GRANTING GOOGLE INC.S APPLICATION TO FILE UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE79-5 20 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Clerk shall enter a redacted version of Defendant Google Inc.s Motion To Disqualify Plaintiffs Counsel And For Temporary Stay, as well as the Declaration of Matthew S. Warren In Support Of Google Inc.s Motion To Disqualify Plaintiffs Counsel, on the public docket and maintain under seal the confidential versions that are not redacted. (lc) |
Filing 20 APPLICATION for Leave to File Document Under Seal filed by Defendants Google, Inc., Waze, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2 Certificate of Service)(Berta, Michael) |
Filing 19 Certificate of Interested Parties filed by Defendants Google, Inc., Waze, Inc., identifying Google Inc.. (Berta, Michael) |
Filing 18 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Google Answer to Complaint 16 . The following error(s) was found: Local Rule 7.1-1 No Certification of Interested Parties and or no copies. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (lc) |
Filing 17 ORDER that the Scheduling Conference is set for 5/5/14 1:30 PM ; compliance with FRCP 16, and 26(f) and filing of joint report; Counsel for plaintiff shall immediately serve this Order on all parties, including any new parties to the action by Judge Otis D Wright, II (lc) |
Filing 16 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 JURY DEMAND. filed by Defendants Google, Inc., Waze, Inc..(Berta, Michael) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Emily Clare Hostage on behalf of Defendants Google, Inc., Waze, Inc. (Attorney Emily Clare Hostage added to party Google, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Emily Clare Hostage added to party Waze, Inc.(pty:dft))(Hostage, Emily) |
Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Sean Michael Callagy on behalf of Defendants Google, Inc., Waze, Inc. (Attorney Sean Michael Callagy added to party Google, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Sean Michael Callagy added to party Waze, Inc.(pty:dft))(Callagy, Sean) |
Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Michael A Berta on behalf of Defendants Google, Inc., Waze, Inc. (Attorney Michael A Berta added to party Google, Inc.(pty:dft), Attorney Michael A Berta added to party Waze, Inc.(pty:dft))(Berta, Michael) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Otis D Wright, II: This action has been assigned to the calendar of Judge Otis D. Wright II. Counsel are encouraged to review the Central Districts website for additional information. ( SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC FILING REQUIREMENTS AND INFORMATION; AND REFER TO JUDGES PROCEDURES AND SCHEDULES FOR DETAILED INSTRUCTIONS RE SUBMISSION OF SEALED DOCUMENTS , EXCLUDING THOSE SUBMITTED BY PRO SE PARTIES AND IN CAMERA FILINGS ).(lc). |
Filing 11 STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Google, Inc. answer now due 2/21/2014; Waze, Inc. answer now due 2/21/2014, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by Plaintiff Eclipse IP LLC.(Olavi, Matt) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Eclipse IP LLC, upon Defendant Google, Inc. served on 1/2/2014, answer due 1/23/2014; Waze, Inc. served on 1/2/2014, answer due 1/23/2014. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon CSC-Lawyers Incorporating Service, Inc., Registered Agent for Service of Process in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by personal service. Original Summons NOT returned. (Olavi, Matt) |
Filing 9 PATENT STANDING ORDER by Judge Otis D. Wright, II (lc) |
Filing 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 . The following error(s) was found: Other error(s) with document(s): Attachment 1, Civil Cover Sheet, should have been filed separately. You are not required to take any action in response to this notice unless the court so directs.. (jpr) |
Filing 7 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 as to defendant Google, Inc., Waze, Inc.. (jpr) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (jpr) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Otis D. Wright, II and Magistrate Judge Paul L. Abrams. (jpr) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by Plaintiff Eclipse IP LLC. (Olavi, Matt) |
Filing 3 Certificate and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Eclipse IP LLC, (Olavi, Matt) |
Filing 2 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Eclipse IP LLC. (Olavi, Matt) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: 0973-13163185 - Fee: $400, filed by Plaintiff Eclipse IP LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Attorney Matt Olavi added to party Eclipse IP LLC(pty:pla))(Olavi, Matt) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.