Shannon Fabrics, Inc. v. Jo-Ann Stores, Inc.
| Shannon Fabrics, Inc. |
| Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. |
| 2:2013cv09509 |
| December 27, 2013 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Percy Anderson |
| Stephen J. Hillman |
| Trademark |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
177
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson: The Court has conducted a preliminary review of the revised pretrial documents submitted by plaintiff Shannon Fabrics, Inc. and by defendant Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. following the Further Pretrial Confere nce conducted on April 17, 2015. As with the Court's earlier reviews of the parties' previous pretrial documents, the Court has concluded that the revised pretrial documents continue to show a complete breakdown in the level of professional ism expected of counsel appearing before this Court. The Court therefore vacates the Further Pretrial Conferencescheduled for April 24, 2015. The Court will provide the parties with one final opportunity to meet and confer, resolve the vast majority of the outstanding issues, and submit further revised pretrial documents. The meet and confer is to be attended by lead trial counsel. The time for delegating the physicalpreparation of pretrial documents to associates and paralegals, leaving to them the task of reading and complying with this Court's orders, has ended. The Court holds lead trial counsel responsible for both the form and content of the pretrial documents submitted to this Court. These revised pretrial documentsshall be file d by 10:00 a.m. on Monday, April 27, 2015. Should these revised documents still require the Courts time to discuss the parties' disputes, that discussion shall occur beginning at 8:30 a.m. on Tuesday, April 28, 2015. Counsel are ordered to prov ide a copy of this Order to their respective clients and, no later than 10:00 a.m. on April 27, 2015, file a Declaration with the Court signed under penalty of perjury that counsel have discussed the contents of this Order with their clients. See document for details. (smo)
|
|
Filing
157
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Percy Anderson:, Set hearings: The Court sets a further pretrial conference for Friday, April 17, 2015, at 1:30 p.m. before Judge Percy Anderson. (smo)
|
|
Filing
29
PROTECTIVE ORDER CONCERNING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION by Judge Percy Anderson.See document for details. (gk)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shannon Fabrics, Inc. v. Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Jo-Ann Stores, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Lisa J Chin |
| Represented By: | Cyrus M Khojandpour |
| Represented By: | Enoch H Liang |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Shannon Fabrics, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Dylan C Dang |
| Represented By: | R Joseph Trojan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
