Daniel Maag v. QIAGEN Inc
Plaintiff: Daniel Maag
Defendant: QIAGEN Inc
Case Number: 2:2014cv00380
Filed: January 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Alicia G. Rosenberg
Presiding Judge: Christina A. Snyder
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION REGARDING PLAINTIFF AND OPT-INPLAINTIFFS ATTORNEYS FEES AND COSTS AND DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Christina A. Snyder: re Stipulation for Attorney Fees, Stipulation to Dismiss Case 29 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rne)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Daniel Maag v. QIAGEN Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: QIAGEN Inc
Represented By: Nada I Shamonki
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Maag
Represented By: Jesse S Brar
Represented By: Adam William Hansen
Represented By: Jason Christopher Marsili
Represented By: Rachhana T Srey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?