Waseem Daker v. Samantha Ann Mokwa
Plaintiff: Waseem Daker
Defendant: Samantha Ann Mokwa
Case Number: 2:2014cv00395
Filed: January 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Michael R Wilner
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2014. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2014 Filing 18 MANDATE of 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #6 CCA # 14-55653. The decision of the District Court is affirmed. Mandate received in this district on 12/9/14. (mat)
November 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #6 filed by Waseem Daker, CCA # 14-55653. The motion to recall the mandate is granted. The mandate is recalled. Appellant's motion to stay appellate proceedings is denied. Order received in this district on 11/24/14. [See document for further information]. (car) Modified on 11/26/2014 (car).
October 17, 2014 Filing 16 MANDATE of 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #6 , CCA # 14-55653. The decision of the District Court is AFFIRMED. Mandate received in this district on 10/17/14. (mat)
September 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #6 filed by Waseem Daker, CCA # 14-55653. Appellant's motion to extend time to file petition for rehearing or motion for reconsideration is granted. Appellant's petition for rehearing or motion for reconsideration is due on or before October 7, 2014. Order received in this district on 9/23/14. (mat)
August 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #6 filed by Waseem Daker, CCA # 14-55653. A review of the district court record and appellant's July 28, 2014 response to the court's June 11, 2014 order demonstrate that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's February 6, 2014 and March 24, 2014 orders. Order received in this district on 8/21/14. (mat)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #6 filed by Waseem Daker, CCA # 14-55653. On July 28, 2014, appellant filed a motion to stay appellate proceedings and a motion for an extension of time to pay the $505 docketing and filing fees for this appeal. The motion to stay appellate proceedings is denied. The motion for an extension of time to pay the $505 docketing and filing fees is granted in part. Within 21 days of this order, appellant shall have one final opportunity to comply fully with the court's June 11, 2014 order and pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal and file proof of payment with this court. As stated in the June 11, 2014 order, because the court has found that this appeal is frivolous, the district court's orders entered February 6, 2014 and March 24, 2014 may be summarily affirmed even if appellant pays the fees. Failure to comply with the court's orders shall result in the dismissal of this appeal for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply fully with the courts June 11, 2014 order, the court will not entertain any motion to reinstate the appeal that is not accompanied by proof of payment of the docketing and filing fees. Briefing remains suspended pending further order of the court. Order received in this district on 8/5/2014. (dmap)
August 5, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #6 filed by Waseem Daker, CCA # 14-55653. Appellant's motion of an extension of time to comply with the court's June 11, 2014 order is granted. Pursuant to the June 11, 2014 order, if appellant wishes to pursue this appeal despite the court's finding that it is frivolous then, on or before August 1, 2014, appellant shall pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal and file proof of payment with this court. Otherwise, the appeal will be dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute, regardless of further filings. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. As stated in the June 11, 2014 order, because the court has found that thisappeal is frivolous, the district court's orders entered on February 6, 2014 andMarch 24, 2014 may be summarily affirmed even if appellant pays the fees. If appellant pays the fees and files proof of such payment in this court, appellanttherefore shall simultaneously show cause why the orders challenged in this appealshould not be summarily affirmed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6. If appellant pays the feesbut fails to file a response to this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal forfailure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1.If the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the courts June 11,2014 order, the court will not entertain any motion to reinstate the appeal that isnot accompanied by proof of payment of the docketing and filing fees and aresponse to the order to show cause.Briefing remains suspended pending further court order. Order received in this district on 8/5/2014. (dmap)
July 31, 2014 APPEAL FEE PAID: re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #6 as to Plaintiff Waseem Daker; Receipt Number: LA100548 in the amount of $505. (dmap)
June 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #6 filed by Waseem Daker CCA # 14-55653. Appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied because we find that the appeal is frivolous. If appellant wishes to pursue this appeal despite the courts finding that it is frivolous then, within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal and file proof of payment with this court. Otherwise, the appeal will be dismissed by the Clerk for failure to prosecute, regardless of further filings. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. See the order for the rest of the details. Order received in this district on 6/11/2014. (dmap)
May 13, 2014 Filing 10 NOTICE of Change of address Filed by Plaintiff Waseem Daker. (kl)
April 24, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER from 9th CCA filed re: Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #6 filed by Waseem Daker, CCA # 14-55653. A review of the docket reflects that appellant has not paid the docketing and filing fees for this appeal. Within 21 days from the date of this order, appellant shall: (1) file a motion with this court to proceed in forma pauperis; (2) pay $505 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal and provide proof of payment to this court; or (3) otherwise show cause why the appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. If appellant fails to comply with this order, this appeal will be dismissed automatically by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. Order received in this district on 4/24/14. [See document for details] (mat)
April 23, 2014 Filing 8 NOTIFICATION by Circuit Court of Appellate Docket Number 14-55653 9th CCA regarding Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals #6 as to Plaintiff Waseem Daker. (dmap)
April 22, 2014 Filing 7 FILING FEE LETTER issued as to Plaintiff Waseem Daker, re Notice of Appeal to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, #6 (car)
April 21, 2014 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEAL to the 9th CCA filed by plaintiff Waseem Daker. Appeal of Order on Motion to Vacate, #5 , Order on Request for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees (CV60P), #2 Filing fee $ 505 Billed. This document has been manually mailed to address noted on notice of appeal. (car)
March 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; (2) DENYING REQUEST TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF FILING FEE; AND (3) DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge George H. King. (See Order for further details) #4 Motion to Vacate (vm)
March 12, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 3 NOTICE OF DOCUMENT DISCREPANCIES AND ORDER by Judge George H. King ORDERING Plaintiff's Rule 59(e) Motion to Vacate Judgment and for Reconsideration of IFP Status and MOtion to Amend Complaint submitted by Plaintiff Waseem Daker received on March 5, 2014 to be filed and processed; filed date to be the date the document was stamped Received but not Filed with the Clerk. (vm)
March 5, 2014 Filing 4 MOTION to Vacate Judgment and for Reconsideration of IFP Status and Motion to Amend Complaint filed by plaintiff Waseem Daker. Order on Request for Leave to Proceed without Prepayment of Filing Fees (CV60P), #2 (vm)
February 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER by Chief Judge George H. King, with the RECOMMENDATION of Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner, denying #1 Request for Leave to File Action Without Prepayment of Full Filing Fee. REASON: Frivolous, malicious or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; (SEE ATTACHED RECOMMENDATION AND ORDER). [MD JS-6, Case Terminated] (esa)
January 16, 2014 Filing 1 AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF Request to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; Authorized withdrawal form; Certified Affidavit of Inmate Account Status, filed by plaintiff Waseem Daker. (Attachments: #1 Lodged Complaint)(ghap)
January 16, 2014 LODGED COMPLAINT forwarded to Magistrate Judge Michael R. Wilner. Complaint sought to be filed by Plaintiff Waseem Daker. (ghap)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Waseem Daker v. Samantha Ann Mokwa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Samantha Ann Mokwa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Waseem Daker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?