Iris Crystal Hale v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Iris Crystal Hale v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Iris Crystal Hale v. Carolyn W. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Iris Crystal Hale
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	2:2014cv00426
Filed:	January 17, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Michael W. Fitzgerald
Presiding Judge:	Frederick F. Mumm
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 12, 2014	Filing 14 JUDGMENT by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jm)
April 17, 2014	Filing 8 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PROOF OF SERVICE WAS NOT TIMELY FILED by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. The Court has reviewed its own files and records and notes plaintiff failed to timely submit a Proof of Service of Summons and Comp laint by March 28, 2014, as required by the Courts Case Management Order. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing within 30 days of the date of this minute order why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. A properly completed proof of service will be deemed sufficient compliance with this order. (es)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 12, 2014

Filing 14 JUDGMENT by Judge Michael W. Fitzgerald: IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jm)

April 17, 2014

Filing 8 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY PROOF OF SERVICE WAS NOT TIMELY FILED by Magistrate Judge Frederick F. Mumm. The Court has reviewed its own files and records and notes plaintiff failed to timely submit a Proof of Service of Summons and Comp laint by March 28, 2014, as required by the Courts Case Management Order. Plaintiff is ordered to show cause in writing within 30 days of the date of this minute order why this matter should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. A properly completed proof of service will be deemed sufficient compliance with this order. (es)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Iris Crystal Hale v. Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Iris Crystal Hale
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?