Shawn Cavette v. Rick Hill

Shawn Cavette v. Rick Hill

Petitioner:	Shawn Cavette
Respondent:	Rick Hill
Case Number:	2:2014cv00812
Filed:	February 3, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	Manuel L. Real
Presiding Judge:	Alicia G. Rosenberg
Nature of Suit:	Habeas Corpus (General)

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
August 12, 2014	Filing 9 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Manuel L. Real for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 7 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendatio n of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any Objections to the Report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (mp)
February 19, 2014	Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/19/2014. On February 3, 2014, Petitioner filed a Petition for Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons discussed below, it appears that the one-year statute of limitations has expired. The court, therefore, orders Petitioner to show cause, on or before March 19, 2014, why this court should not recommend dismissal of the petition with prejudice based on expiration of the one-year statute of limitations. (See Order for details.) (mp)

Date Filed

Document Text

August 12, 2014

Filing 9 ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Manuel L. Real for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 7 . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendatio n of the United States Magistrate Judge. Petitioner has not filed any Objections to the Report. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. IT IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice. (mp)

February 19, 2014

Filing 3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 3/19/2014. On February 3, 2014, Petitioner filed a Petition for Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. For the reasons discussed below, it appears that the one-year statute of limitations has expired. The court, therefore, orders Petitioner to show cause, on or before March 19, 2014, why this court should not recommend dismissal of the petition with prejudice based on expiration of the one-year statute of limitations. (See Order for details.) (mp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Shawn Cavette v. Rick Hill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Shawn Cavette
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Rick Hill
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?