JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v. Mega Capital Funding Inc
Plaintiff: JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Defendant: Mega Capital Funding Inc
Case Number: 2:2014cv01187
Filed: February 14, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: George H. King
Presiding Judge: Alka Sagar
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge George H. King, re Notice of Settlement 42 Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)
June 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 33 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar. (See Order for complete details) (afe)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v. Mega Capital Funding Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mega Capital Funding Inc
Represented By: Thomas J Ryu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JPMorgan Chase Bank NA
Represented By: Gregory Marshall Sudbury
Represented By: David D Piper
Represented By: David Andrew Tong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?