Marv W. Durment et al v. The Burlington Insurance Company et al
| Marv W. Durment, Jarvis Enterprises Inc and Minadora Holdings LLC |
| Does, Murchison & Cumming LLP and The Burlington Insurance Company |
| Endurance American Specialty Insurance Company, a Delaware Corporation |
| The Burlington Insurance Company |
| 2:2014cv01231 |
| February 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F. Eick |
| John A. Kronstadt |
| Insurance |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
186
JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Judgment is now entered in favor of Endurance and against Plaintiffs as to each and every cause of action asserted against Endurance in Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. Judgment is now entered in favor of Burlington and against Plaintiffs as to each and every cause of action asserted against Burlington in Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint. Endurance and Burlington shall recover their allowable costs in an amount to be determined based on an approval of the appropriate application. (jp)
|
|
Filing
156
JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Judgment is now entered in favor of Defendant Burlington and against PlaintiffsMarv W. Durment, Minadora Holdings LLC, Jarvis Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a OrangePrecision Metal Fabrication as to each and every cause of action asserted againstDefendant Burlington set forth in Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint, including theThird, Fourth and Fifth Causes of Action.Judgment is now entered in favor of Defendant Endurance and against PlaintiffsMarv W. Durment, Minador a Holdings LLC, and Jarvis Enterprises, Inc. d/b/a OrangePrecision Metal Fabrication as to each and every cause of action.This Court having granted defendant Murchison & Cumming, LLP's Motion toDismiss on May 16, 2014, and having further determined that defendant Murchison & Cumming, LLP was fraudulently joined, Judgment is hereby entered in favor ofMurchison &Cumming, LLP and against Plaintiffs.Each Defendant shall recover its allowable costs in an amount to be determined. (bp)
|
|
Filing
143
JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Judgment is now entered in favor of Defendant Endurance and against PlaintiffsMarv W. Durment, Minadora Holdings LLC, and Jarvis Enterprises, Inc., d/b/aOrange Precision Metal Fabrication as to each and every caus e of action assertedagainst Defendant Endurance set forth in Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint.Judgment is now entered in favor of Defendant Burlington and against PlaintiffsMarv W. Durment, Minadora Holdings LLC, and Jarvis Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Orange Precision Metal Fabrication as to each and every cause of action assertedagainst Defendant Burlington set forth in Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint.An award of costs may be recovered, in an amount to be determined, followingthe filing of the appropriate application and the consideration of any objections. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
