George Hudson v. Alfredo Franco et al
| George Hudson |
| Alfredo Franco and Richardson |
| 2:2014cv01247 |
| February 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Unassigned |
| Carla Woehrle |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
57
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge Josephine L. Staton for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 53 , and NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's Complaint on behalf of Defendants Franco and R ichardson 44 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED as follows: (1) Plaintiffs claims against Defendants Alfredo Franco and Kirk Richardson in their official capacity are DISMISSED without leave to amend; (2)Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claim against Defendants Alfredo Franco and Kirk Richardson and Plaintiffs Eighth Amendment claim is DISMISSED without leave to amend; and (3) Defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Plaintiffs Fourteenth Amendment claim against Defendants Alfredo Franco and Kirk Richardson. (mrgo)
|
|
Filing
38
Order to Show Cause Why Action Should Not Be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute and Comply With Court Orders by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 9/14/2015. (dts)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
