Edward Makaron v. GE Security Manufacturing Inc et al
| Edward Makaron |
| Does, GE Electric International Inc, GE Security Manufacturing Inc, Security One Alarm Inc and UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc. |
| 2:2014cv01274 |
| February 19, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Alicia G. Rosenberg |
| George H. Wu |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
77
JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT UTCFSA by Judge George H. Wu. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the plaintiffs take nothing in their claims against UTCFSA, that the claims against UTCFSA be dismissed on the merits with prejudice, and that Plaintiffs and UTCFSA, by agreement, bear their own fees and costs. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)
|
|
Filing
52
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg re Stipulation for Protective Order 51 l. Upon stipulation of the Plaintiffs and Defendant UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation, Inc., ("UTCFSA"), and upon review of the court r ecord in this matter and for good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: The Court hereby enters the folllowing protective order in this case to govern the treatment of materials marked by a Designating Party as "CONFIDENTIAL" or as "CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS' EYES ONLY". ***** SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. ***** NOTE CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT. ***** (mp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
