Raina Gustafson v. Experian Information Solutions Inc. et al
| Raina Gustafson |
| Does, Experian Information Solutions Inc., HSBC Bank USA National Association and Systems & Services Technologies, Inc. |
| 2:2014cv01453 |
| February 26, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Charles F. Eick |
| Otis D. Wright |
| Consumer Credit |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
83
JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Plaintiff take nothing, thatthe action be dismissed on the merits and that Defendant Systems & ServicesTechnologies, Inc. recover its costs of $5,292.40.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT SYSTEMS & SERVICES TECHNOLOGIES, INC.S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 47 . Defendant SST shall file a proposed judgment by June 12, 2015 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II. (lc). Modified on 6/2/2015 (lc).
|
|
Filing
38
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Charles F. Eick re Stipulation for Protective Order 36 . (sp)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT SYSTEMS & SERVICES TECHNOLOGIES, INC.S MOTION TO DISMISS 14 by Judge Otis D. Wright, II: The Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART SSTs Motion to Dismiss as enumerated above. Since the Court denies leave to amend on the grounds for which it grants SSTs Motion, SST shall file its answer to the Complaint within 14 days. (lc). Modified on 5/21/2014 .(lc).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
