Robert Johnson v. Raman Patel et al
| Robert Johnson |
| D. Drayton, Garcia, Lawson, Raman Patel and Rush |
| 2:2014cv01598 |
| March 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Unassigned |
| Sheri Pym |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
100
ORDER ACCEPTING FINAL FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge R. Gary Klausner for Report and Recommendation (Final) 98 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 21 is DENIED. (iva)
|
|
Filing
74
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Magistrate Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: Order: Lifting Stay [Dkt. 66] and Denying DefendantPatels Motion to Compel as Moot [Dkt. 73] 73 Motion to Compel (dts) (Main Document 74 replaced on 11/20/2015) (dts).
|
|
Filing
72
ORDER by Judge R. Gary Klausner re: 71 STIPULATION to Dismiss. In accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1), and pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, all claims against Defendant R. Rush, D. Drayton, and K. Lawson only are dismissed with prejudice. (See document for specifics.) (iva) Modified on 9/10/2015 (iva).
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge R. Gary Klausner for Report and Recommendation (Final) 58 , MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Based on Plaintiff's Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies 21 , MOTION to Dismiss fo r Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief Can Be Granted (FRCP 12B6) 42 , MOTION to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint 19 . IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: (1) defendants D. Drayton, Lawson, and J. Garcias Motion for Summary Judgment be denied; (2) defendants D. Drayton, Lawson, J. Garcia, and Rushs Motion to Dismiss be granted in part and denied in part; and (3) defendant Dr. Raman Patels Motion to Dismiss be denied. (mrgo)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
