Donald M Lusnak v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
Donald M Lusnak |
Bank of America, N.A. and Does |
2:2014cv01855 |
March 12, 2014 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
George H. King |
Andrew J. Wistrich |
Contract: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 130 ORDER AND FINAL JUDGMENT GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT by Judge George H. Wu, in favor of Donald M Lusnak against Bank of America, N.A. Related to: Order on Motion for Settlement, Order on Motion for Attorney Fees, Motion Hearing, [1 29]. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED as follows: 1. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein have the meanings set forth in the Settlement Agreement. 2. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 1332(d), and has personal jurisdiction over the Parties and the Settlement Class Members. Venue is proper in this District. 3. The "Settlement Class" for purposes of this Final Order and Judgment means: (see document for details). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mrgo) |
Filing 66 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge George H. Wu. (See document for details) (mrgo) |
Filing 34 JUDGMENT by Judge George H. King. IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff shall take nothing by this Complaint. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.