Davalan Sales, Inc. et al v. My Orchard, LLC et al
Plaintiff: |
Davalan Sales Inc and Davalan Sales, Inc. |
Defendant: |
Deep Arya and My Orchard, LLC |
Case Number: |
2:2014cv01990 |
Filed: |
March 14, 2014 |
Court: |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Presiding Judge: |
Charles F. Eick |
Nature of Suit: |
Agriculture Acts |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
May 7, 2015 |
Filing
23
JUDGMENT by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew, in favor of Davalan Sales, Inc. against My Orchard, LLC and Deep Arya in the principal amount of $16,387.32, interest in the amount of $16.16, attorneys fees of $3,950.00, costs of $400.00 for a total judgment of $20,753.48. Related to: Order on Request to Reopen Case, 22 , Order, Terminated Case 18 (jre)
|
June 10, 2014 |
Filing
14
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Ronald S.W. Lew. The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Cour t, on its own motion, hereby orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than June 24, 2014, why this action should not be dismissed as to the remaining defendant for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintif f(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: PLAINTIFF'S FILING OF A MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT. No oral argument of this matt er will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. Failure to timely respond to this order may result in the dismissal of this action. (jre)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?