Randall D Tomlinson v. Linda T McGrew
Petitioner: Randall D Tomlinson
Respondent: Linda T McGrew
Case Number: 2:2014cv02094
Filed: March 19, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: David T. Bristow
Presiding Judge: Valerie Baker Fairbank
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 16, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 19 JUDGMENT by Judge Valerie Baker Fairbank. Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 18 , final judgment is hereby entered in favor of the respondent and against the petitioner. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Randall D Tomlinson v. Linda T McGrew
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Randall D Tomlinson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Linda T McGrew
Represented By: Diana L Pauli
Represented By: Gwendolyn Millicent Gamble
Represented By: Assistant US Attorney LA-CV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?