Robert J. Mendonca et al v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc. et al
| Irene Mendonca and Robert Mendonca |
| Caliber Home Loans, Inc., Does, J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Northwest Trustee Services, Inc. |
| 2:2014cv02384 |
| March 28, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Beverly Reid O'Connell |
| Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION by Judge Andre Birotte Jr.: THE COURT having been advised by counsel that the action has been settled 87 ; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is hereby dismissed without costs and without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 45 days, to re-open the action if settlement is not consummated. This Court retains full jurisdiction over this action and this Order shall not prejudice any party to this action. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER TO TO CAUSE RE FAILURE TO OPPOSE by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell.Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why J.P. Morgan's motion should not be granted. Plaintiffs response to this order to show cause must be filed no later than Wednesday, May 28, 2014, at noon. An appropriate response to this order will include reasons demonstrating good cause for Plaintiffs failure to file anopposition to J.P Morgan's motion. (rfi)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
