Neman Financial, L.P. et al v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc. et al
| Shervin Neman and Neman Financial, L.P. |
| Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Does |
| 2:2014cv02499 |
| April 2, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Paul L. Abrams |
| Beverly Reid O'Connell |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
85
JUDGMENT by Judge Virginia A. Phillips, in favor of Citigroup Global Markets Inc. against Shervin Neman: Upon consideration of the Motion for Summary Judgment, any oppositions and replies thereto, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and that Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. Defendant has shown that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and that Defendant is entitled to judgment as a m atter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). Plaintiff Shervin Neman cannot prove causation and damages, which are required elements of each of his claims. In addition, Plaintiff Shervin Neman's claims are barred by the doctrine of unclean hands. Plaintiff Neman Financial, L.P. previously was dismissed from this case. The Clerk shall enter judgment in favor of Defendant and close the case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bm)
|
|
Filing
29
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED 23 by Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell. Plaintiffs are ORDERED TO SHOW CAUSE why Citigroup's Motion to Dismiss should not be granted. Plaintiffs' response to this Order must be filed no later than Wednesday, December 3, 2014, at 5:00 p.m. An appropriate response will include reasons demonstrating good cause for the failure to timely oppose Citigroup's motion. Defendant is ORDERED to serve a copy of this Order to Show Cause by Personal Delivery on Plaintiff Neman Financial, L.P., no later than the close of business on November 26, 2014 and file the Proof of Service. IT IS SO ORDERED. (rfi)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
